Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
2 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
3 | CHUSID Renata (Renata Chusid) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
3 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
5 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% |
6 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
7 | LAU Sydnee M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
8 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
9 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 35% |
10 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
11 | ZAROFF Roxanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
12 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
13 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
14 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
15 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
16 | IBEN Claire L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
17 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
18 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
19 | CHEN Nicole Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
20 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
21 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 17% |
22 | YU Seneca | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% | |
23 | BRADFORD Meeah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 3% |
24 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
24 | ZHANG Sylvia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
26 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
27 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
28 | FAN Elaine | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
29 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 9% | |
30 | CHENG Lydia A. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 36% | 6% | |
32 | LEE Paulina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
33 | TAKAGI Hikaru G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
34 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
35 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% |
36 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
37 | TONG Ophelia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | 30% | 5% | |
38 | DING Abigail | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
39 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
40 | CHO Taylor S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
41 | LAU Chloe M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
42 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
43 | SUH Kailey E. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
44 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
45 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
47 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
48 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
49 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
50 | LEE Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
51 | KANG Jiyoon | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
53 | GOMES Rafaella T. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
54 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% |
55 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
55 | YIN Helen | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
57 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
58 | ALTEN Ayaka | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
59 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
60 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
61 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
62 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
63 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - |
64 | TRAN Ava D. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
65 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
66 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
67 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
68 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
69 | NAM Cassie | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
70 | RAMAN Tanvi | 100% | 99% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
70 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
72 | CHEN Shiuan-An Shannon | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
73 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
74 | CHON Sydney | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
75 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
76 | WU Kyra | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
77 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
78 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
79 | DUMAINE Matilda J. | 100% | 65% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
80 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
80 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
82 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
83 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
84 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
85 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
86 | JACINTO JENNA R. | 100% | 62% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
87 | SU Alysa J. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
88 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
89 | HO Rachel E. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
90 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
91 | SCHWARTZMAN Salma | 100% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
92 | VENFORD Annetta S. | 100% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - | |
93 | YANIV Liya | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
94 | DHILLON Amani | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.