Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
2 | LEE Jiahn (Lana) | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% |
3 | REN Kayley | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
3 | DENG Melissa | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
5 | DUAN Sophie | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
6 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 37% | |
7 | SWANSON Alexa | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 31% | 4% | |
8 | LIU Samantha | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
9 | BAE Yooju | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
10 | YONG Rosalind | - | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
11 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
12 | MU Allison | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% | |
13 | HO Addison | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
14 | MORALES LEDEZMA Georgina Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% |
15 | DO Leila | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
16 | TAYLOR Gabby | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% | |
18 | SUN Emily | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
19 | ZOU Ella | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
20 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% | |
21 | KIM Sydney | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
22 | LEE Allison | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 41% | 13% | |
23 | KO Claire | - | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
24 | GORDOA SOFIA | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 20% |
25 | ZHANG Ivy | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
26 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 17% | |
27 | HOBSON Ava | - | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% | |
28 | GUAN Adeline | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
29 | ZONG Melody | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
30 | LENK Sophie | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
31 | CHOI Kailyn | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
32 | WU Chingfei Amber | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
33 | HAN Ashley | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
34 | BOLES Amanda X. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
35 | XIE Su | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
36 | LUH Mia P. | - | 9% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 1% | |
37 | ANDONIAN Lauren | 2% | 39% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | |
38 | DESAI Esha | 1% | 18% | 49% | 26% | 5% | - | |
39 | MAYER Cécile | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
40 | LIU Ariana | 1% | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
41 | HAN Crystal | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% |
42 | CAMPOS Camila | 6% | 38% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
43 | FANG Kelervia | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
44 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 1% | 9% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
45 | LAY Apollonia | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
46 | CHANG Janelle | 14% | 55% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
47 | MORALES Paulina | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
47 | LI Joy | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
49 | KIM Lauren | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
50 | HUGHES Liv | 3% | 56% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
51 | IDANAWANG Allison | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
52 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 22% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
53 | BUI Aubrie | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
54 | CUI Alivia | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
55 | IDANAWANG Madison | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
56 | XI Sophia | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
57 | ATALLAH Camilla | 11% | 51% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.