Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 2 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
| 3 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
| 5 | LIANG Megan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 26% |
| 6 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 7 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% | |
| 8 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
| 9 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 45% |
| 9 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 11 | SONG Jenny | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% | |
| 12 | GORDON Tamar | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 13 | YAP Madeline | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 15 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 16 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 17 | CASHMAN Natalie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | CHANG Josephine S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% |
| 19 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 20 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 21 | HAN Jeanette X. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 31% |
| 23 | SUNGA Arabella Krystienne M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 25 | KOZAK Sonja A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 4% |
| 26 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 27 | BEALE Zoe M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 10% | - |
| 28 | CHING Sapphira S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 29 | SEHIC Cassandra | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 31 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 33 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 34 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 35 | TOM Kristen Noelle C. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 34% |
| 37 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
| 38 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 40 | ZUO Xiaofan | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 41 | DHAR Aamina | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 43 | RHIE Lena | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | SATHE Mehek S. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | LIM Isabel K. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 47 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 48 | KOO Samantha | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 50 | LIMB Madeline I. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 51 | CHEEMA Sophia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 52 | BURCH Makana Y. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
| 54 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 55 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 56 | PATEL Riya | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 57 | GEYER Carolina M. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | 100% | 97% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 59 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 60 | LIN Zhiyin | 100% | 83% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | GULATI Ria | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 61 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 63 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 64 | KALRA Siya L. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 65 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 66 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% | |
| 67 | CANNON Sophia E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 68 | WANG Elsabella Y. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 69 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 71 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 72 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 73 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 75 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 100% | 90% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | YURT Leyla | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 77 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | YANG Kaitlyn H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 79 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 80 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 81 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 82 | JASSEY Julia M. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | FREY Sarah E. | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.