University of Houston - Campus Recreation and Wellness Center - Houston, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TIEMANN Landen | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 2 | LIBSON Tazman | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | V V D V D V | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 3 | EAST William | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 5 | GOODMAN Benjamin | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.0 | 5 | +3.0 |
| 6 | ELLISOR Drayten | V V D D V V | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 7 | VAUGHN Matthew (Manny) E. | V V D D D | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 8 | YILMAZ Tarik | D V V D D D | V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 9 | WOODALL Ian L. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | SOOS Whitman | V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 11 | MULDOON Thomas | V V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | VAN VACTER Thomas | V V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 13 | PEREZ Daniel | D D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 14 | WOJCIK Janusz | V V V V D D | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 15 | OBREBSKI Kevin | V D V D V | V D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 16 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | V V V D D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 17 | RAO Neil | V V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 18 | PEI Suyang | V V D D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | LU Ryan | V V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 20 | MAYHEW Clinton (Clint) M. | V D D V V V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 21 | COHEN Nathan | D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | LI Tristan | D D V V V D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 23 | SCEROLER Anslee | D V V D D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 24 | VILLAREAL Quentin | D D D V V V | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 25 | POHL Philip | D V V D V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 26 | KIM Alexander | V D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 27 | VRUBEL Eli | D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | POOLE James M. | D V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 29 | GREGORY Dean | D D D V D V | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 30 | BACCHUS Sheik | D D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 31 | NIXON Scott | D D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 32 | RASMUSSEN Jacob | D D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | SATHYAN Dev | D D V V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 34 | RASMUSSEN Eric | V D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 35 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | D D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 36 | VRUBEL Nathan | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 37 | TUMULA Arihaan | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | THROWER Caden | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 39 | OLSON Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 40 | RUSS Zachary | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.