The Simpsonville Activity Center - Piedmont, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DHOKTE Neev | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 2 | CAMPBELL Justin | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 59% | 27% |
| 3 | YANG Ethan J. | - | - | - | 5% | 37% | 58% | |
| 3 | PARK Zena | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 5 | VIVEROS Antonio | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 44% | 11% | |
| 6 | MONAGHAN Claire (Micah) | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 7 | LEBEDOVYCH Tristin | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 8 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | - | - | 5% | 29% | 48% | 17% | |
| 9 | MILES Greyson | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 10 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
| 12 | CLARK Robert | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 13 | CAGLE Robert | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 14 | FLYNN Oliver | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 15 | LIU Hangda | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 16 | MCARTHUR Kemp | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 17 | RILEY Owen | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | COLLINS Andrew M. | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 29% | 4% | |
| 19 | OH Seonghun | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | SHULER Alden | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | FAUERBACH James | 43% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 22 | DAVIS Case | 9% | 36% | 40% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | CALL Mackenzie | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | HUGHES Kayla | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | COLLINS Andrew V. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 26 | BROADHURST Julien | 32% | 46% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 27 | SANDERSON Holden | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 28 | HAZEL Susan L. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | SIGGINS Wally | 1% | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 30 | WATERS Samantha M. | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | SMITH Katherine E. | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | - | |
| 32 | MCNEW Declan | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 33 | GROSSMAN Jackson | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 34 | MONES Robert (Bob) J. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 35 | DOVER Felix | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | MOBBLEY Michael | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 37 | ALLEN Charles | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | - |
| 38 | MANTOFEDCZUK Daniel | 4% | 30% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | HAYWOOD Madison | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 40 | BRUCE Naomi | 14% | 43% | 36% | 6% | - | - | |
| 41 | SHIEH Kiley | 12% | 35% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | ALTMAN Robert L. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | WILSON Mason | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 44 | COPE Wilson | 12% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.