French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 25% | 74% |
| 2 | RIGHTLER Samuel | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
| 3 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 3 | SCHARDINE James | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 5 | BAUER Hank E. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 6 | LAI Yat Hay Casper | - | - | - | - | 5% | 50% | 45% |
| 7 | LIU Kelly | - | - | - | - | 6% | 50% | 44% |
| 8 | FERNANDEZ Juan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
| 9 | WAGNER Elijah | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 10 | FARIDI Imran | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 11 | XIAO Yao | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
| 12 | BARNES William | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 13 | LEE Hanho | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 1% |
| 14 | MYERS Kaleb S. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 15 | CAISSE Simon B. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 16 | JAYASANKAR Hari | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 17 | GAJKOWSKI Leif | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 18 | HUA Michael | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 19 | HU CHIEH-CHI | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 20 | SMITH anthony G. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 21 | SOCHA Daniel | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
| 22 | HANEY Zachary | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 23 | ZHANG Chuanxi | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | BAILEY Conner | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 25 | TAGUE Jonathan | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 26 | LIU Yizhe (Andy) | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | MBERIA Alexander | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | FENG Junkai | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | HU Andy | 4% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | WOO Brian | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | WU Stephen | - | 7% | 32% | 42% | 18% | 1% | - |
| 32 | MEYTIN Maxwell S. | 44% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | JIANG Bowen | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 34 | KU Raymond | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | WHITIS Arlo | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 36 | GELMAN Zachary R. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | VILLEGAS Aidan | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | BLAIR Connor | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | EILER Luke | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | TINSLEY Justin | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | GUTHRIE Andrew | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.