Event Results
Marx/Vivo Developmental FoilDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHEN Keegan | V V V V V | V V V | 1.5 | 5 | +3.5 |
| 2 | LU Ethan | V V V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 3 | ZARAYSKI Thomas | D D V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 4 | MIALL Linda | V V D V D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 5 | WU Yulen | D V V V V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 6 | CAO Vivien | V D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 7 | NADTOCHEVA Vera | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 8 | WULIN George | D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 9 | SELIGER-SCHAMBERG Jonah | V D D V D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 10 | LI Catherine | D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 11 | CONDON John | V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 12 | DAVE Jay | D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 0 | -3.2 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |