Marx Fencing Academy - Acton, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WU Alexander | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 37% | 9% |
| 2 | LI Andrew | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 3 | BU Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 4 | DENG Jonathan | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 5 | LECH Landon | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 6 | ANDERSON Kai | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 7 | KIRBY Emelie | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 8 | ARNOULD Frederick | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 9 | BHOSREKAR Som | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 3% |
| 10 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 12% | 41% | 39% | 8% | - | - |
| 11 | DAVE Neil | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 12 | WULIN Nicholas | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - |
| 13 | KUKLINA Maria | 31% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 14 | PELLERIN Liam | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 15 | PARK Ethan | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 16 | TANAKA Nico | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 17 | OGILVIE Marsden | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | CONNELLY Malcolm | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | BLAIS Julian | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | SHINDE AKSH | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 21 | MA Cloris | - | 20% | 45% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 22 | SCHNEIDER Aiden | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | HAMM Noah | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 24 | SULLIVAN Dennis | < 1% | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 6% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.