Alpharetta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TREBON Hayden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | TAM Ethan | V V | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 3 | HWANG Aidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 5 | KIM Sangone Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | OLDHAM Aidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | HWANG Brandon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | ROCKWELL Nolan | D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 9 | REDDY Daksh Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | TURK Reggie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | SRAMBIKKAL Pranav Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | ADCOCK Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | JEONG Arisu Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | HENESY Liam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | LIU Ziyi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | ZHOU Alex | V | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
| 17 | PARK Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | ANSLEY Sam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | BURKE Aiden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | JAIN Aadi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | SAVANI Aayan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | KUNCHAKURI Ritvik Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | MOSLEY Khyri Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | MAYO Candler | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
| 25 | LEE Winston Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | SAYHOUD Mouhtez Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | NGUYEN Hubert Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | GOLDEN Ryan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | EDGECOMBE Miller Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | ENG Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | SEO Luke Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | PINSONEAULT Cooper Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | MENON Rahul Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | IYER Arjun Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | SIGG Noah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | KNIGHT Micah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | LOEGEL Carter Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | PAZOS Andy Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | LEE Sean Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | POYOTTE Teddy Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | DANG Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | ACOSTA Santiago Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | ARUNACHALAM Aadhavan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | GEBELEIN Will Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | PARRISH Gabe Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | BRADFIELD Ryan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | YAN Kevin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 48 | LEE Maddox Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | BASU Avik Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | BALY Amr Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 51 | BOWERS Morgan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | FRANCIS Shiloh Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 53 | WANG Jalon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 54 | BREED Freddie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 55 | RODGERS Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 56 | TOUSSAINT Kadaj Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 57 | JOSHI Jay Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | SNIDER Bodhi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | RILEY Jackson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 60 | HUBBELL Sean Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 61 | PONDER III Alfred Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 62 | HOLLINHEAD Caleb Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 63 | OCCHIALINI Bennett Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 64 | LUEDER Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 65 | MCMEEKIN Nolan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 66 | MEJIAS Maximo Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 67 | CONWAY Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 68 | STAPLETON Yan Li Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 69 | BIOLSI Carter Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.