NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 38% |
2 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
3 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 8% |
3 | EDWARDS Auprell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
5 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 56% |
6 | BUECHEL Holly M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% |
7 | POLANICHKA Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% | 11% |
8 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 2% |
9 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
10 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
11 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
12 | GONG SIYU | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
13 | LI Caroline | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
14 | XU Serena | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
15 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
16 | NGUYEN Celena | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
17 | FENG Ge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
18 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 24% |
19 | CHOY LeeAnn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
19 | LI Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 29% | 4% |
21 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
22 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | 14% |
23 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
24 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 12% | 1% |
24 | MONOVA Lilyana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% | - |
26 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% |
27 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
28 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 13% |
29 | KAUR Manroop | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - |
30 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 13% |
32 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
33 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
34 | WESER Veronica U. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | 2% |
35 | PARSONS Mischa | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | LI Yixin Catherine | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
37 | PRESMAN Aerin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
38 | MARCHANT Morgan | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
39 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
40 | QUADRI Saira | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
41 | FENG Iris | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
42 | GORDET Cristina G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
43 | DUNNE Jessica | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
44 | TIBBETTS Lily | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
45 | MONITTO Malina | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
46 | PAN Angela | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
47 | BRISK Angelica A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
48 | PHELAN Gabrielle | 100% | 80% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
49 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 81% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
50 | YANG Eleanor | 100% | 80% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
51 | BANNERMAN Courtney | 100% | 75% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
52 | SIZER Courtney | 100% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
52 | BEJUGAMA Lasya | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
54 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 100% | 64% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
54 | GAVILANES Madyson | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
56 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.