Livingston, NJ - Livingston, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | ||
| 1 | WERRELL Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 95% | 87% | 71% | 49% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 2 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 93% | 82% | 65% | 45% | 26% | 13% | 5% | 2% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 3 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 95% | 86% | 72% | 53% | 34% | 18% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 92% | 81% | 65% | 45% | 27% | 13% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 5 | MOTIR Lucas D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 93% | 83% | 67% | 48% | 29% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | HAO Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 94% | 86% | 71% | 52% | 33% | 17% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 7 | MARAKOV Allen B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 97% | 92% | 82% | 65% | 45% | 25% | 11% | 3% | 1% | - | |
| 8 | PANARIN Nicholas (Nick) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% | 94% | 87% | 73% | 56% | 36% | 20% | 8% | 3% | 1% | - | - |
| 9 | SHREM Samuel G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 83% | 63% | 38% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - | |||||||
| 10 | BAKER Kevin G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 86% | 67% | 42% | 20% | 7% | 2% | - | - | |||||||
| 11 | BONIN Jr. Christopher J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 71% | 45% | 21% | 7% | 2% | - | - | - | - | |||||||
| 12 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 73% | 48% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
| 13 | DING Phillip C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 93% | 79% | 56% | 31% | 13% | 4% | 1% | - | - | |||||||
| 14 | BOGUSLAVSKY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 76% | 52% | 27% | 10% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | |||||||
| 15 | ROSEBORO Brian R. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | |||||||||||||
| 17 | LENAHAN Conor J. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |||||||||||||
| 18 | CHAUDHRY Rafay | 100% | 80% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |||||||||||||
| 19 | RODELL Hunter C. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | ||||||||||||||
| 20 | MOYSE Alexander S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |||||||||||||
| 21 | MUNROE Shane | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |||||||||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.