Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHAN Daphne | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 29% | |
| 2 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | - | - | - | - | 1% | 25% | 75% |
| 3 | HORSLEY Asherah | - | - | - | - | 36% | 64% | |
| 3 | COOPER Piper W. | - | - | 2% | 22% | 57% | 19% | |
| 5 | SUN Emily | - | - | - | 1% | 23% | 51% | 25% |
| 6 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | - | 4% | 31% | 58% | 6% | |
| 7 | LEE Yejine | - | - | - | < 1% | 12% | 87% | |
| 8 | REN Kayley | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 27% | 3% | |
| 9 | AADHI Hansika | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 10 | URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia | 1% | 16% | 49% | 30% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 11 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 79% |
| 12 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 55% | 8% |
| 13 | HO Brianna W. | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 74% | |
| 14 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | 3% | 33% | 64% | |
| 15 | PARK Rowan M. | - | - | - | 1% | 63% | 35% | |
| 16 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | - | 5% | 46% | 40% | 9% |
| 17 | LEE Allison (Allie) | - | - | - | - | 17% | 83% | |
| 18 | HUNG Juliana K. | - | - | 1% | 18% | 49% | 32% | |
| 19 | QUINN Anna | 3% | 19% | 42% | 33% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | HAN Katherine | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | LI Grace | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% | 1% |
| 23 | TONG Ophelia | - | - | - | - | 12% | 46% | 41% |
| 23 | LI Eleanor | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 25 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | 2% | 19% | 66% | 12% | |
| 26 | SHELTON Olivia | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | MUHAMMAD Auset | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | - | 3% | 31% | 48% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 29 | CAMPBELL June | 10% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | HARRIS Parker | 18% | 47% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | KHAN Leena | 12% | 58% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | GOZIEVA Saida | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 42% | 31% | 2% | |
| 33 | GUAN Adeline | - | - | 3% | 23% | 52% | 20% | 1% |
| 34 | TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
| 35 | ISHANOVA Sofia | 2% | 18% | 46% | 34% | - | - | |
| 36 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | 12% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | BERTOLINI Mia | 2% | 20% | 46% | 30% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | SHUSTA Lily | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | JERNEY Agustina | 2% | 17% | 45% | 33% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | COLLINS Anna | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 41 | LOVE Brianna | 19% | 47% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 42 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa T. | 13% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 6% | 32% | 45% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | SWOPE Farren | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | DONG Emily | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | KELLEY Sophia | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | KOZINSKI Allison E. | - | 6% | 43% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 10% | 45% | 36% | 9% | - | - | - |
| 49 | GOLLNICK Mira | - | 6% | 29% | 49% | 15% | 1% | |
| 49 | MALVESTUTO Evelyn | 40% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | KANG Marian | 4% | 24% | 47% | 24% | - | - | |
| 52 | RIES Celina | 42% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | OWEN Ashley | - | 4% | 31% | 50% | 15% | - | |
| 54 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | 25% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 55 | LOVAN Audrey | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | MCDANIEL Laila | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | LEGGETT Emilia | 66% | 32% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | SOROUR Amira | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 59 | ATHOW Stephanie J. | 14% | 42% | 34% | 9% | - | - | |
| 60 | MAEDA Hotsumi | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | TELCI Arya | 24% | 64% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 62 | RYAN Aoife | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 63 | BENFORD Hannah | 10% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 64 | REESE Rebecca M. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.