Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
| 2 | HOWLAND Jonas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% | |
| 3 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
| 3 | ZAIDI Adil | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 5 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
| 6 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 14% |
| 7 | TAN Xinlai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 30% | |
| 8 | LIU Yinhong | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 9 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% |
| 10 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
| 11 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 26% |
| 12 | LEE Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 72% | 28% | 4% |
| 13 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% |
| 14 | YIN Zixin(Gavin) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 15 | LU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 45% | |
| 16 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% | |
| 17 | ZHAO Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 21% |
| 18 | CLARK Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 39% | 6% |
| 19 | KO Cheuk Yip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
| 20 | HEYBOER Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | 4% |
| 21 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 54% | 15% | 1% |
| 22 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 13% | |
| 23 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 100% | 89% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | DAVIS Benjamin | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 46% | 8% |
| 26 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 99% | 82% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 28 | MENASCO Juliun | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 29 | PHONPRASANSACK Grayson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | TOEWS Jackson | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 31 | LIM-SEIWERT Tristan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | BALES Gabriel | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 6% | |
| 34 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
| 35 | HONG Derek | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | JARCHO Beckett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 37 | NI Aaric | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | VARRE Rishi | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 39 | FOSTERVOLD Castiel | 100% | 75% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | ZINSER James | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 41 | WEBSTER Liam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 42 | ZHANG Hanson | 100% | 98% | 75% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | DRAWZ Chase | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | KWAN Victor | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | ROBINSON Ezekiel | 100% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | DIFRANK Tae | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | TAGORE Reyansh | 100% | 92% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | KIM Ethen | 100% | 81% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | YATES Graeme | 100% | 65% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | FERGUSON Levi | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 51 | XU Rambert | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | YOUNG Jack | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 54 | TOMOV Evan | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 56 | SCOTT Alex | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | COSGROVE Franklin | 100% | 98% | 77% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 58 | WINTERS Linus | 100% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | SKIBELL Cyrus | 100% | 57% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.