Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHUSID Renata (Renata Chusid) M. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
| 2 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 3 | JING Alexandra | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
| 3 | HOOSHI Erica S. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 49% | 12% |
| 5 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 6 | WANG Ellen | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 7 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 8 | HO Brianna W. | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 9 | KIM Lauren Hyomin | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 9% |
| 10 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 11 | SADAN Jordan E. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 12 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
| 13 | PATEL Anika | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 14 | SHANG Andrea | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 15 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | MING YUE | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | DU Hannah | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 18 | WERBACH Esther | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | VEERKAMP Molly | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 2% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 21 | SEGAL Lydia G. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 22 | YU Jaime L. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 23 | PAGES Melanie | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | NICOU Melina | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 26 | YE Catherine | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.