Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BUCHMANN Vivien | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 2 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 72% |
| 3 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
| 3 | CHEN Erica | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 5 | DRAGON Rainer | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 6 | CANNON Sophia E. | - | - | 8% | 31% | 42% | 19% | |
| 7 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 8 | YURT Leyla | - | 2% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
| 9 | TANG Annie L. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 10 | SHVARTSMAN Rochelle | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 11 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 12 | BOIS Adele | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 4% | |
| 13 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% | |
| 14 | LARGAESPADA Fatima | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
| 15 | BROWN Emma | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
| 16 | GARIBIAN Emma E. | - | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 17 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
| 18 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 19 | ZOLA Candace J. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | SUBER Victoria | - | 16% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 21 | SCHMITT Alana P. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 22 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 10% | 35% | 40% | 15% | |
| 23 | DARINGA Arianna | 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 24 | SPORN Melanie | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 25 | DANIELS Erica | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | KIM Catherine D. | - | 1% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 10% | |
| 27 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 28 | HU Allison C. | 5% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | KOO Samantha | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 2% |
| 30 | MACE Eliza M. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 31 | RODGERS Sally E. | 1% | 18% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | JIN Olivia P. | - | 11% | 37% | 38% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | O'HARA Eimile J. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | KIM Nam Heui | 6% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | GIRARDI Aemilia | 34% | 57% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | IQBAL Sulphia | 11% | 43% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | MASSO Tiana | 9% | 46% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LIGH Karis | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | MASSO Tiara | 54% | 42% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | BEST Janee | 71% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.