Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 2 | IGOE Nirali B. | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 3 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% | |
| 3 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 5 | GANSER Yuliya | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 6 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 7 | KANG Dahyun | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 8 | LUI Leanna M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% | |
| 9 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 10 | LEE Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 6% |
| 11 | LAANSOO Karen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 8% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Maya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 13 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 14 | LEE Olive | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | BROWN Amanda | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 16 | BELAOUSSOFF Kira | 100% | 99% | 94% | 78% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | ROA RODRIGUEZ katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 18 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | LEE Kyungmin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 20 | LI AnnieSiliang | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | LAWSON Marie A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% | |
| 22 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | DICKINSON Alexandra P. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 24 | TOLBA Salma | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 25 | YAO Jillian | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 26 | WOLSTENHOLME-BRITT Samantha (Sam) G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 27 | ZHAO Yingying | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | WU FAN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | 2% |
| 29 | NICOU Nicole | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | KIM Caroline | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 33 | MCGEE Sophia | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 34 | BIGGS Amelia F. | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | 100% | 86% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 83% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.