Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | OSOLINIEC Victor E. | D V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 2 | KOLASA Thomas M. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | MIKA Casper | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 5 | YEN Darren | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 7 | ZU Kevin | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 8 | LIN John A. | D V D V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 9 | DENNER Lysander H. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 10 | KIM Minwook | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 11 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 12 | CHO Brandon | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 14 | WUN William | D V V V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 14 | KIM Avery J. | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 16 | ZHOU Miles | D D D D D D | V V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 17 | HONG Marshall Q. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | BARNETT Adam | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 19 | YEN Preston | V V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 20 | CHOU Stephen C. | V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 21 | LASORSA Matthew | D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 22 | GILES Jeremy M. | V D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 23 | LO Joshua H. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 24 | HUAYTA James W. | V V D V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 25 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | LILOV Neil | V D V V D D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 27 | LUO ZiRui | D D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 28 | RAI Avin | V V D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 29 | YAO Jonathan | V V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 30 | MORREALE John | D D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 31 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | D D D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 32 | TANG Albert | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 33 | SHI Andrew | V V D V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 34 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | V V D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 35 | MICHELL Bailey | V V D V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 36 | TAKEMARU Leo | D V V D V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 37 | PEDERSEN Leif | D D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 38 | LIN William | D V V D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 39 | QIU Le | D D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 40 | KAHN Justin M. | V D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 41 | HENNICKE Michael G. | D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 42 | XU Michael | V V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 43 | HUDDY Brandon J. | D V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 44 | TANG Brendan J. | D V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 44 | GANTA Vijay | V D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 46 | JUN Ryan | D V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 47 | CHAN Daniel | V D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 48 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 49 | LEE Jude H. | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 50 | METTKE Nathaniel | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 51 | DEWEY Charles J. | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 52 | MORRIS Samuel A. | D D D D D V | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 | |
| 54 | LIU Kelly | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 56 | HEREFORD Ramses D. | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 57 | FISK Ethan | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.