Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DAVID Maxime | V V V D V D | V V V V V V | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 2 | HOLMES Andrew E. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | HOLMES Stuart S. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 3 | TUMMINGS C.J. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 5 | PELOSKY Ryan F. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 6 | LUTAR Lucas N. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 7 | KATAYAMA Kevin | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 8 | DUBE Charles-Hugo | V V V D V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 10 | KENNARD M Henry B. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 11 | DIVENTI Paul W. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | PRILUTSKY David B. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 13 | ADLER Ian B. | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 14 | LOCKWOOD Owen | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 15 | SIEGEL Elliot | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 16 | YU Vinni | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 17 | MA Alexander | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 19 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 20 | PRINCE Nicholas J. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 21 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | D V V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 22 | HEMPE Jake | V D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 23 | HARTMARK Anders | V D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 24 | BRANDT-OGMAN Adlai | V V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 25 | WU Albert | V D V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 26 | KIM Nicholas W. | D D D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 27 | JANG Jaewon | D V V D V D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 28 | MILLER Trent D. | V D V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 29 | LEE Daniel C. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 30 | MAURER Ned (John) E. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 31 | BADRIGIAN William H. | D V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 32 | HEALY Griffen | D D D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 33 | LIN Richard W. | D V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 34 | DOBBINS Evan W. | V V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 35 | PETER Griffin | V D D V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 36 | WEISS Barrett A. | V V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 37 | CARMAN Ian K. | V D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 38 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | V D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 39 | STANLEY Mason B. | V D V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 40 | BOBROW Logan | D V D V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 41 | CAI Oliver K. | D V D V V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 41 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | V D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 43 | GROSS Liran | D V V D V D | D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 44 | ADLER David R. | D V V V D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 45 | DULA Patrik L. | D V V D D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 46 | LIU Kevin B. | V D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 47 | HO Ryan J. | V D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 48 | RICCIO Frank J. | D D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 49 | GEE Brandon | V V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 50 | FU Samuel Y. | D D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 51 | CORTIZAS John (Jack) | D D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 52 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | D V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 53 | GU Jeffrey | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 54 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | D D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 55 | FU Yifan | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 56 | PUGLISI Will | V D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 57 | FRITZ Ayden R. | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 57 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | D D D D D V | D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 59 | SINGH Dayaal | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 60 | CRALEY Thomas M. | D V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 61 | WANG Michael | D D D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 62 | SCHULTES Evans | D D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 63 | LEVESQUE Louis | D D D D D V | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 64 | HEWES Thomas G. | D D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 65 | MILLER Andrew | D D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 66 | HILMER Michael | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 67 | ZHAO Jesse | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 68 | BOISLARD Adam J. | D D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 0 | -3.1 |
| 68 | MONTALBINE Aidan | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 70 | WANG William | D D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.