Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHEARER Natalie E. | - | - | 2% | 29% | 54% | 15% | |
2 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
3 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | - | - | 1% | 22% | 77% |
3 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% | |
5 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | - | - | - | 8% | 41% | 51% | |
6 | TANG Camilla | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
7 | HILD Nisha | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% |
8 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | - | 5% | 27% | 47% | 19% | 2% | |
9 | PABIAN Emilia | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 2% |
10 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% | |
11 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 14% | |
12 | WU Yuwei | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
13 | ZHAI AMY | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
14 | WALLER London | 2% | 24% | 62% | 11% | 1% | - | |
15 | DAVIS Jayna M. | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 31% | 3% | |
16 | BAEZ Sophia | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
17 | SINGER Ellery | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - | |
18 | LU Amy | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 56% | 10% |
19 | ISBERG Natalie | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 5% |
20 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 1% | 16% | 57% | 25% | |
21 | TESTROET Aubrey | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
22 | ZAWADA Milena | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
23 | CHAMI Lana | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
24 | SAYSON Andrea | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
25 | ALDORT Amanda | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
26 | PETTIT Sara M. | 1% | 7% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
27 | JACHYMIAK Emilia | 27% | 49% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
28 | SCHOON REBECCA | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
29 | HEATH Katy | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
30 | WAY Samantha | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | - |
31 | QUINN Anna | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - | |
32 | LIN Annika | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - | |
33 | GRODY Emmie | - | - | 6% | 44% | 40% | 10% | |
34 | MALLAMPATI Jaabili | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
35 | NEWMARK Ellie | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
36 | GHALI Anya | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - | |
37 | MILLER Sophia | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
38 | KATZ Maddy | 57% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | |
39 | BAAZIM Hadeel | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
40 | FRYMAN Isabel | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | FINN Lucy | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
42 | XIAO Sophia | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
43 | ATHOW Stephanie J. | 11% | 52% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
43 | WILSON Sophie | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
45 | SOBERY Lillian | 26% | 58% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.