Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
2 | XU Elaine | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
3 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
3 | NIU Jessica | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
5 | LEE Alyson | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
6 | SUNG Olivia | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
7 | KWON Ava | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
8 | GONG Joy | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
9 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
10 | MACKAY Katherine | - | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 34% | 5% |
11 | REN Katherine | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
12 | YU Stella | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
13 | PARK Haylie | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
14 | YU Skylar | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
15 | ZHAO Selena | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
16 | WANG Emily | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
17 | NG Sophia | - | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | < 1% |
18 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
18 | NADKARNI Marisa | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
20 | CASTELO Soleil | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
21 | KIM Grace | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
22 | CHOI Charlotte | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
23 | HEATH Isabella | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
24 | FUNG Iris | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 37% | 6% |
25 | WONG Charlene | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
26 | LIU Chelsea | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
27 | JOHN Sophia | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
28 | NEMORIN Rei | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
29 | MAK Jayden | 3% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
30 | WANG MONA | 3% | 18% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
31 | KIM Grace | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
32 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | MAK Kaitlin | - | 4% | 14% | 28% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
34 | HU Alicia | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
35 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
36 | BORGUETA Madison | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
37 | KO Ariel | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
38 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
39 | ZONG Eliane | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
40 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
41 | CHANG Norah | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
42 | CAFAGNA Sofia | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
43 | LAFFY Lily | 11% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
44 | HO Sophia | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
45 | WANG Keira | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
46 | MULLER Inara | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
47 | LEIGH Adalene | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
48 | ELLINGWOOD Sophia | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
49 | LIU Stephanie | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
50 | MOTOVA Masha | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
51 | WANG Selina | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
52 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 15% | 43% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
53 | YOON Sela | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
54 | CHERON Helene | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
55 | ZHANG Nikki | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
56 | HILD Anya | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
57 | SMITH Genevieve | 42% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
58 | YOUNG Sienna | 17% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
59 | HUANG Zoe | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
60 | WU Harper | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
61 | PHILLIPPY Hannah | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
61 | KIM Jodie | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
63 | LEE Jiyoung | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
63 | YE Athena | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
65 | SWAMINATHAN Keerthi | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
66 | HU Sophia | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
67 | DIBADJ Ava | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
68 | SAGER Bianca | 31% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.