Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | WONG Natalie | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% | |
| 2 | CHANG Annette | - | 2% | 9% | 22% | 31% | 24% | 10% | 2% |
| 3 | FENG Alicia G. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 3 | BORTAI Eliza | 4% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - | |
| 5 | CAI Veronica | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% | |
| 6 | MISHEV Lila | - | 1% | 5% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 4% |
| 7 | WONG Cerise | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 28% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 8 | HWANG Charlotte | 1% | 4% | 16% | 28% | 29% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 9 | SENGUPTA Jia | - | 1% | 4% | 14% | 28% | 31% | 18% | 4% |
| 9 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | - | - | 1% | 6% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
| 11 | TONG Laurie | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | |
| 12 | SNOAD Indy | 2% | 10% | 25% | 31% | 22% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 13 | YAO Reeva | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - | |
| 14 | LIU Hannah | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | ASPIRAS Avery | 6% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 11% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | LAUREYNS Ainsley | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | MORINAGA Mirai | 1% | 9% | 23% | 31% | 23% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 18 | HUSS Miriam | 5% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | DOXAN Sarah | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 20 | ROBBINS Adele | 9% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 8% | 2% | - | - |
| 21 | SANTOS Charlize | 3% | 15% | 29% | 29% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 22 | DEMETRIS Kira | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 2% | |
| 23 | SAMPATH Medha | 5% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.