Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HU Alicia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 2 | MULLER Inara | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 3 | REN Katherine | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 3 | YU Stella | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
| 5 | ZHAO Selena | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 6 | XU Elaine | - | - | 2% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 7 | CHOWDHERY Myra | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 4% |
| 8 | KIM Grace | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 9 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 10 | SUNG Olivia | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 11 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 12 | NEMORIN Rei | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 13 | PEREIRA Izumi | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 14 | HEATH Isabella | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 15 | YU Skylar | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 16 | WANG MONA | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 17 | ZHANG Wuxin | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 18 | YOUNG Sienna | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 19 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | MAK Jayden | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 21 | KO Ariel | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | WANG Keira | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | DEMRY Kylee | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | LIU Stephanie | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | WILLER Anna | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 27 | ZHANG Nikki | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | KIM Jodie | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ZHANG Shihan | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 30 | WU Harper | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WANG Emily | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 32 | MALUKI Nia | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 33 | SMITH Genevieve | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 34 | YE Athena | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | WANG Chloe | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | WANG Selina | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | CHANG Grace | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | HU Sophia | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | YI Victoria | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | LI Gloria | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | RADELL Zoe | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.