Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAO Abby | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
| 2 | CHAN Mila | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% | |
| 3 | WANG Doreen | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% |
| 3 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% | |
| 5 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 6 | CHANG Lydia | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
| 7 | ARYA Leela | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 47% | 18% |
| 8 | CHENG Audrey | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 6% | |
| 9 | KIM Natalie | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 10 | PAN Samantha | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 8% | - | |
| 11 | LI Audrey | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
| 12 | HSU Rachel | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
| 13 | NICOLETTI Thea | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | HOM Emma | 2% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | LIN Avery | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | THOTA Akira | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 10% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% | |
| 18 | PAWAR Sanvi | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 19 | LEE Abigail | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 20 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 21 | ZALTZMAN Maya | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 22 | KIM Audrey | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 6% | |
| 23 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | WANG Ellen | 16% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | LAI Olivia | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | YU Xintong | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - | |
| 27 | LAU Shu Yeung Sophia | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | AHN Hayley | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 2% | |
| 29 | KIM Rylie | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 30 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 31 | YU-TAN Claire | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | DONG Nancy | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 34 | YIN Anthea | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | IRELAND Moira | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | THERIOT Reagan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | JOESUF Thea | 3% | 23% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | STERNAD Pia | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | SCHOR Katherine | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | GUO Jianing | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | ZHANG Annabelle | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | - | |
| 42 | CHO Rylee | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 43 | CHAN Amelia | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | LEE Annalyn | 30% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 45 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | LUO Olivia | 17% | 45% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | KIM Ines | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | FENG Sophia | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 49 | KAIMAN Tabby | < 1% | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
| 50 | STOCK Nina | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.