Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 80% |
| 2 | YIN Chloe | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
| 3 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 3% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 11% |
| 3 | JOO Sara | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 5 | LI Christina | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
| 6 | BYK Karalina | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 43% | 8% | |
| 7 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 8 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 49% |
| 9 | ZHU Ella | - | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 10 | BO Iris | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 45% | 21% | |
| 11 | XING Melly | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 2% | |
| 12 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 13 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% |
| 14 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% | - |
| 15 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 16 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 2% |
| 17 | LUO lucy | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
| 17 | ZHU Alivia | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 19 | CASCONE Sophie | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 20 | KIRBY Emelie | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 21 | PAEK Mila | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | YOUM Amelia | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 23 | KIM Lael | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 24 | LE Minnie | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 25 | LIAW Audrey | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 26 | WU Charlotte | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | VO Evelyn | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 29 | GENG Emma | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | WU Annie | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | LI Doreen | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | PAEK Ellie | 8% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | LIU Bella | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | JU Victoria | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | 1% | |
| 35 | LIANG Jasmine | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | BALMER Zoe | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | MORENCY-NICHOLLS Lia | 14% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | CLOUD Chrystie | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | ZELDIN Nina | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | HUDSON Sophie | 28% | 50% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | FOREST Ana Luisa | 1% | 9% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
| 42 | GOMEZ Amelia | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | DONG Katelyn | 43% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 43 | HAMPTON-DOWSON Winter | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | TOTINO Claire | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 46 | CHIN Harper | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.