Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 42% | 13% |
| 2 | FUNG Iris | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 22% | |
| 3 | GONG Joy | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 36% | |
| 3 | CHOWDHERY Myra | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | |
| 5 | KATZ Emma | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 52% | 14% |
| 6 | VINOKUR Anita | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
| 7 | FOSS Persephone | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 8 | NIU Jessica | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 9 | MAK Jayden | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 10 | CHOI Charlotte | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 11 | IANNUZZI Lucy | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 12 | WONG Charlene | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% |
| 13 | LAFFY Lily | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | ZONG Eliane | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | KIM Grace | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 16 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | MAK Kaitlin | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 18 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 19 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
| 20 | JOHN Sophia | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 21 | HILD Anya | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 22 | MEYERSON Michelle | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 23 | LEIGH Adalene | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 24 | JUNG Elise | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 25 | NANDA Maanika | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
| 26 | WANG Keira | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | KIM Eunjae | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | LEE Grace | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 29 | CAFAGNA Sofia | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 30 | ZHAO Selena | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | SHI Chuqing | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 32 | LEE Jiyoung | 16% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SAGER Bianca | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 34 | LEE Kaitlin | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 2% |
| 35 | YOON Sela | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 37 | WEI Avril | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 38 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | SMITH Genevieve | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | WANG Chloe | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | KARAVAS Lucy | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | GONZALEZ Alexis | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 43 | YOUNG Sienna | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 44 | SHAH Miraya | - | 3% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 45 | PATEL Sia | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SPIESS Linnea | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | VINBOR COSTA SANTOS Sasha | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | ALMEDA Galina | 11% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | PARKER Mrinali | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | KIM isabel | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 50 | MADDISON Erica | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | MISHRA Riona | 3% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | DIBADJ Ava | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | JUN Sofia | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | HAGN Luna | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | FAZAL Sasha | 1% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 57 | DILALLO Olivia | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 57 | ZHU Iris | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | MADDISON Estelle | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | GOLEN Grace | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 61 | LEE Janice | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.