The Edge - Twinsburg, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Fiona E. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
2 | HAN Katherine | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
3 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
3 | HARRIS Parker | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
5 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% |
6 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
7 | HOROWITZ Shuli | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
8 | DIRKES Catherine | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
9 | KHAN Leena | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
10 | LEVY Gabrielle | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
11 | ADLER Zoe | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
12 | STONE Sydney | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
13 | DINH May | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
14 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
15 | MALVESTUTO Evelyn | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
17 | SAMALA Reese | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
18 | HANNAH Abigail | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
19 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
20 | YU Angela | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
21 | XIONG Isabel | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
22 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
23 | VINS Katherine | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
24 | ZOLDAN Nolabelle | 4% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | LYON Claire | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
26 | MAEDA Hotsumi | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
27 | LATIFI Fara | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.