Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
2 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 18% |
3 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 45% | |
3 | JI Johnson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
5 | KHANNA Adamantis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
6 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
7 | BARENBOYM Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
8 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 34% |
9 | FADEL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 10% |
10 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
11 | LOO Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% | 7% |
12 | SALDARINI Glenn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
13 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
14 | LEMERY Marc | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
15 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
16 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
17 | TRZEPLA Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% |
18 | SASSI Ilyas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
19 | MERMEGAS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
20 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
21 | LIN Brendan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
22 | CRAWFORD William | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
23 | WAXLER Alex | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
24 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
25 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
26 | LEVIN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
27 | ONG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 4% |
28 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
29 | LIU ERIC | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
30 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% | |
31 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
32 | FRANCOIS Gabriel | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
33 | SAGE Nikolai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 25% |
34 | CHAMBERS Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
35 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
36 | MELE Gianni | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
37 | LEE Ivan | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
38 | NAYAGAM Nishant | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
39 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
40 | LIEU Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
41 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
42 | BERKOWITZ Gavin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 28% | |
43 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
44 | HE Nolan | 100% | 97% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - | |
44 | HOUPT Lucas | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
46 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
47 | BENNETT Lachlan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
48 | TITOV Zachary | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
49 | LEIGH Brayden | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
50 | MHLEY Gavin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
50 | CHEN Brendan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
52 | GUPTA Arav | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
53 | SO Morgan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
54 | NARAYAN Rishi | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
55 | DAYAMA Ronak | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
56 | SUBA Mason | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
57 | ORIE Sohan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
58 | GRIGORYAN Sevak | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 20% | 2% | |
59 | MARSHQUIST Miles | 100% | 82% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
60 | SAYAR Luke | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
61 | QIN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
62 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
63 | ZHIVICH Theo | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 3% |
64 | DAYO Trev | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
65 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
66 | HE Eric | 100% | 82% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |
67 | LI Michael | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
68 | FOUX Jonathan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
69 | ABELTSAI Hauke | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
70 | OREN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
71 | BURENKOV Matthew | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
72 | MATTOO Dhruv | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | - |
73 | BAKER Alexander | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
74 | HAIRABEDIAN Ellis | 100% | 66% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
75 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
76 | DATTILIO Aidan | 100% | 91% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
77 | MENZIES Liam | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
78 | WANG Harrison | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
79 | PEACE Sam | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
80 | CARR Silas | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
81 | KULKARNI Ishir | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
82 | CONNOLLY Edward Bud | 100% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
83 | EARLEY Jack | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
84 | DANIELS William | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
85 | CUSSON William | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
86 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
86 | DAI Ethan | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
88 | RAJMOHAN Syon | 100% | 49% | 8% | - | - | - | |
89 | NIEJADLIK Samuel | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
89 | TANJGA Luka | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
91 | LI Jayden | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
92 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
93 | SONG Jerry | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
94 | PATEL Kiran | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
95 | LI Kent | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.