Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUN Chloe | - | - | 1% | 14% | 50% | 35% | |
2 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 47% | 39% |
3 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
3 | DENG Melissa | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
5 | CHEN Cynthia | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 50% | 33% |
6 | JIA Amy | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% |
7 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
8 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
9 | LENK Sophie | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
10 | KIM Sydney | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
11 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
12 | WYNN Kylie | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
13 | GUAN Adeline | - | 3% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 5% | - |
14 | REN Kayley | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
15 | TORRES JIMENA | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% |
16 | PENG Serena | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
17 | MU Allison | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 2% |
18 | LEE Michelle S. | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 7% |
19 | BROWN Lola | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
20 | BHATT Morgane | - | - | 1% | 12% | 48% | 40% | |
21 | OH Ceana | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
21 | CHANG Janelle | 42% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
23 | PENG Charlotte | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
24 | RAO Sonia D. | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
25 | YAN Noelle | 1% | 13% | 40% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
26 | ZHANG Ivy | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
27 | CHOI Kailyn | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
28 | XIE Su | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
29 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
30 | HOBSON Ava | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
31 | ZONG Melody | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
32 | HUGHES Olivia | 16% | 52% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
33 | CUI alivia | 1% | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
34 | YONG Rosalind | - | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
35 | DESAI Esha | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
36 | LUH Mia P. | 1% | 14% | 42% | 35% | 7% | - | |
37 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
38 | SHUSTA Lily | 32% | 48% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
39 | DING Madison | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
40 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 23% | 47% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 32% | 48% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
42 | KRAATZ Kira | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
43 | TAI Taphanie | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
44 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | 3% | 39% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
45 | WANG Celine S. | 3% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
46 | GOEL Riyana | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.