Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUO Luxi | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
| 2 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 3 | LIN Ariel | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 3 | SCHOR Elisabeth | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 5 | HANKINS Morgan | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 6 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
| 7 | ABUELFUTUH Sama | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% | |
| 8 | SUN Hanya | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 9 | ZHUANG Lauren | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 8% | |
| 10 | YUNG Bethany | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | WU Jessica | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 12 | KALGAONKAR Arohi | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 13 | BRIDGE Rebekah | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 14 | SHELIN Chelsea | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% |
| 15 | DUONG Zoey | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 16 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% |
| 18 | PHUKAN Indra | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 19 | XU Celina | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 20 | CHANG Celine A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
| 21 | MAI Mailan | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | ENRILE Erica | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 23 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 24 | MOHAN Riya | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 25 | MERRIMAN Rie | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | SALISTRA Emilia | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 27 | MYRAH Vivienne | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 28 | LEE Emily | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 29 | WANG Angelina | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 19% | |
| 30 | DALEY Keira | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 31 | CHENG Wanrong | 1% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CHUNG Penelope | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 33 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 34 | WANG Jessie | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
| 35 | YIN Gabriela | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 36 | LIN Laura | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 37 | XU Jessica | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% | |
| 38 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 2% | 19% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | KANDALA Aanya | 9% | 41% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 41 | WANG Victoria | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 42 | SUN Karolyn | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | PACHECO Carys | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | GUESNARD Maelig | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 45 | BUDMAN Ava | 6% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | SIMHADRI Sanjana | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | LI Azalea | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 48 | YUEN Elsie | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 49 | YANG Arianna | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | BUCA Nora | 8% | 40% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | BHATT Anisha | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
| 52 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | SALAZAR Emma | 1% | 12% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 54 | KROTZ Gemma | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | EYUNNI Vibha | 4% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | RADOV Una | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 57 | REED Katya | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 58 | JAMES Ashley | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 59 | KAUR Jaap | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 60 | BLANCO Ariia | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
| 61 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 62 | JAQUISH Zoey | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 63 | LIN Isabel | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 64 | ZHAO Yanning | 10% | 43% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | LEE Adelynn | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 66 | RAPTIS Layla | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 67 | ZU Jacqueline | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 68 | CHEN Samantha | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | ROCKWOOD Madelyn | 1% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 70 | RASHID Summer | 27% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 71 | MENG Fina | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | MADANNAVAR Trisha | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | LEE Grace | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 74 | SCANLAN Alina Nev | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 75 | LEE Valerie | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 76 | HAN Sydney | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 77 | WU Emma | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 78 | JAIN Aashi | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 79 | NAZARENKO Sasha | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.