Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | - | - | - | - | - | 11% | 88% |
2 | KER Grace | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 60% |
3 | KANG Ellie | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 35% | 2% |
3 | YUEN Nicole | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
5 | CHEN Elaine | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | < 1% |
6 | DIECK Miranda P. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
7 | XIONG Haojiao | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
8 | GOLOVITSER Maya | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
9 | LIU Sydney | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
10 | DANG Kelia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
11 | KALKINA Yelena | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
12 | MAO Elsa | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
13 | DUDNICK Morgan | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
14 | TAN Adelyn | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
15 | MANN Sophia J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 42% | 8% |
16 | WONG Natalie | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
17 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
18 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
19 | HAN Emma | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
20 | RAMOS Katrione Dominae | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
21 | TENG Christine Renmei | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
22 | WANG Jiayi | - | 1% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 9% | - |
23 | ZHAI AMY | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
24 | NING Lynn | - | 5% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
25 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
26 | LIN Annika | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
27 | KIM Satie | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
28 | MAO anna | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - |
30 | STONE Coral | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | - |
31 | SENGUPTA Jia | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
32 | CAI Veronica | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
33 | TONG Laurie | 1% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
34 | FENG Alicia G. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
35 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
36 | SNOAD Indy | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
37 | LI Miranda | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
38 | XIE Shirley | 45% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | DUONG Esther | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
40 | NAIR Supriya | 1% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
41 | OU Yixuan | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
42 | BORTAI Eliza | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
43 | ASPIRAS Avery | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
44 | BENT Sarah | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
44 | PANCHAL Arya | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
46 | KIRBY Skye | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
47 | OOI Ming Qin | 32% | 53% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.