Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 2 | SUN George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 3 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 12% |
| 3 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 18% | 1% |
| 5 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
| 6 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 7 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 8 | BOSITA Carson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 9% |
| 9 | BLINKOV Andrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% |
| 10 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
| 11 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 12 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
| 13 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | 11% |
| 14 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 15 | MILGRAM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | |
| 16 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | YANG Duncan (BoTong) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% |
| 18 | CAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 19 | BULLARD Bennett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 20 | HO Anson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
| 21 | LI linze | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 22 | ANUMULA Aryan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | LI AYDEN | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 24 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 25 | KOVACHEV Martin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | HRISTOV Kris | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | LEE Brian | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 30 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 31 | UYANIK Muhammet | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 32 | LEE Brandon | 100% | 73% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | CHABENAT Guillaume | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 34 | DUDNICK Christian P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 35 | NGUYEN Dylan | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | SINGHAL Armaan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | EKAMBARAM Nikhil | 100% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | LEIGH Edward | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 39 | WONG David | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | VO Landon | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | IYER Neil | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 42 | CHAN Elliott | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | RONG Jasper | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 44 | MENDOZA Christian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 45 | LE Long | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | LUO Wei | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 48 | ROSALES Vincent | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 49 | CHEN Yuan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 50 | KO Zuriel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 51 | CRETEN joachim | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% | |
| 52 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | NAIR Sujit | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | KULKARNI Shreyas | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | XU James | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | STONE Brad | 100% | 86% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 56 | LIAO Yifong | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 58 | TSENG Cooper | 100% | 75% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | BUI Joseph | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | LI Li | 100% | 91% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.