Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 2 | DANIEL Olivia | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 3 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 3 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 5 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 28% | 3% |
| 6 | SINHA Zara | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 7 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 8 | RODARTE Angelina | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | ZHANG mickey | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 47% | 20% |
| 10 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
| 11 | LO Sabrina S. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | YPHANTIDES Anthi | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 13 | HUANG audrey | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 14 | LEE Kaitlyn S. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | MUN Brianna K. | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 16 | YIN Grace | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | CHEN Clara | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 18 | QURESHI Nisa | 3% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | KIM Jayna | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 20 | TRIVEDI Ela | 16% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | FENG Elaine | 1% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | GAURIAT Jade S. | < 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 24 | WOLTERBEEK Catherine | 4% | 33% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.