Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 2 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 3 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 3 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 5 | TRAN Ava D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 6 | ZHANG Sylvia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 7 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 8 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 9 | SUH Kailey E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 10 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 11 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
| 12 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 14 | SU Alysa J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 15 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | |
| 16 | KANG Jiyoon | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 17 | YIN Helen | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 18 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 5% | |
| 19 | LEE Bethanie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 20 | SU Alena J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 21 | LEE Isabelle | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 9% | |
| 22 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% | |
| 23 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | NAM Cassie | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | HWANG Jungmin | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | WANG Catherine K. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 3% |
| 28 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | UMAP Arna | 100% | 92% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | LI Angela | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | LAI Evelyn | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | GREEN Perri L. | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.