Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
2 | XIONG Haojiao | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
3 | ARNOLD Hali | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
3 | CONG Anne | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
5 | LIU Sydney | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
6 | KER Grace | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
7 | DJAMIRZE Zara | - | - | - | 2% | 10% | 36% | 52% |
8 | WANG Jiayi | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 3% |
9 | DANG Kelia | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 48% | 33% |
10 | LIN Annika | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
11 | MANN Sophia J. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% |
12 | MUNGUIA Mila | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
13 | HUSS Miriam | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
14 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
15 | CHANG Annette | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
16 | GAIKWAD Ashmiee | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
17 | NING Lynn | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
18 | MAO Elsa | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
19 | HU Michelle | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
20 | GOLOVITSER Maya | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
21 | OU Yixuan | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
22 | STONE Coral | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
23 | TAN Adelyn | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% | |
24 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
25 | WONG Natalie | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
26 | YUEN Nicole | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
27 | SNOAD Indy | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
28 | KANG Ellie | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
29 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 35% | 5% |
30 | MISHEV Lila | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
31 | IREGUI Sofia | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
32 | SENGUPTA Jia | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
33 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
34 | NAIR Supriya | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
35 | CHEN Elaine | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
36 | LIU kai yin aria | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
37 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
38 | ZHAI AMY | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
39 | RAMOS Katrione Dominae | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
40 | FENG Alicia G. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
41 | DIECK Miranda P. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% | |
42 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
42 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
44 | KIRBY Skye | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
45 | WONG Cerise | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
46 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
47 | XA-CHIN Sara | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
48 | BHAVSAR Vanmayi | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
49 | BORTAI Eliza | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
50 | DUDNICK Morgan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
51 | PANCHAL Arya | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
52 | MAO anna | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
53 | ASPIRAS Avery | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
54 | SANTOS Charlize | 13% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
55 | CAI Veronica | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
55 | KIM Satie | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
57 | BROWNER June | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
58 | LIN Ariel | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
59 | HAN Emma | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
60 | MOON Claire | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
61 | LI Miranda | 5% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
62 | ZHANG JADY | 10% | 42% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
63 | DING Jolie | 21% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
64 | ROBBINS Adele | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
65 | TONG Laurie | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
65 | LEE Adriana | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
67 | SAMPATH Medha | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
68 | WU Chloe | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.