Worcester Fencing Club - Worcester, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KELLEY Hayden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 4% | |
| 2 | PESSIN Nadav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 4% |
| 3 | BAZZANA Beniamino | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 3 | LAMIRANDE Félix-Antoine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 5 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 6 | WEAVER Ethan W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 25% |
| 7 | MICKEY Christopher J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% | |
| 8 | OSHIMA Robert | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 9 | SIALA Omar | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 10 | PARTE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 23% | |
| 11 | HERZOG Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 12 | SONG Ryan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 13 | WOHL Martin A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | |
| 14 | DINSMORE Elliot | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 15 | STEIN Philip | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | SONPAL Winslow | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 18 | SEILS Aether | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | MAGLOTHIN Atticus | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | FARWICK Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 7% |
| 21 | REINEKE Gerhard | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 22 | HERZOG Frank | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | BOWSER Jacob | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | MOSHIER Calvin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 25 | BENNETT Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | RICHARDS Jack | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 27 | CHAVES Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
| 28 | BUMPUS Isaias | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | MIDDLETON Michael | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | SAMRA Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% | |
| 31 | CUFF Joe | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 32 | HIGGINS Paul | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | MITCHELL Colin | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | DURU Arthur | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | BOXER Eishan | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LIN ZICHEN | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | HAN Nathan | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | BENNETT Nathan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 39 | WASHBURN William | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.