Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHO Taylor S. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
2 | YEH Samantha | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
3 | JO Mia C. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
3 | LOCKE Savannah | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
5 | IBEN Claire L. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
6 | ZHANG Sylvia | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 11% | |
7 | OH Erin H. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
8 | CHEN Cynthia | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
9 | SUH Kailey E. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
9 | YU Seneca | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
11 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
12 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
13 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
14 | KIM Alyssa | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
15 | FERNANDES Thea | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
16 | LEE Isabelle | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
17 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% | |
18 | KONG Olivia | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 46% | 17% | |
19 | SU Alysa J. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
20 | HO Rachel E. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
21 | VOHRA Anusha | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
22 | TRAN Ava D. | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
23 | YIN Helen | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
24 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
25 | KIM Kayla A. | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
26 | YANG Blanche | 5% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - | |
27 | WANG Catherine K. | 11% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
28 | PENG Amber L. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
29 | HOBSON Leena | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
30 | YOUNG Audrey S. | 14% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
31 | HSIUNG Samantha | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
32 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
33 | DUAN Konnie | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
34 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
35 | WANG Yiran (Cindy) | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
36 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
37 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | |
38 | KANG Jiyoon | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
39 | SU Alena J. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
40 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | 6% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
41 | KIM Katherine | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
42 | NAM Cassie | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
43 | LI Angela | 29% | 41% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
44 | LIN Joyce | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.