Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | 1% | 17% | 47% | 35% | |
2 | QIU Nathan | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
3 | CHAN Aidan | 3% | 20% | 41% | 31% | 5% | |
3 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | - | 5% | 37% | 44% | 14% | |
5 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% |
6 | BRISTOL Brijen | 11% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
7 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | 2% | 27% | 49% | 22% | |
8 | GAO Albert | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% | |
9 | LIRA Daine C. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
10 | LEUNG Nathan | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
11 | DAVIS Oliver | 44% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | |
12 | GEORGE Arun | 3% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | |
13 | LO Andrew T. | 47% | 47% | 6% | - | - | |
14 | SIVAKUMAR Ashwin | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - |
15 | RAO Rayaan | 40% | 53% | 7% | - | - | |
16 | KIM Ian L. | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.