Metro Tacoma Fencing Club - Lakewood, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | JOHNSON Kingsley | 12% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
2 | KYM David | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 1% |
3 | BOYER Victor | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
3 | MARZOLF Carson | 5% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 3% | |
5 | CLIFTON Ian | 10% | 44% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
6 | MARZOLF Griffin | - | 2% | 23% | 48% | 26% | |
7 | HOOYER Ezra | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 7% | |
8 | CRAM Kenneth | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% |
9 | KIM Philip | 15% | 44% | 34% | 7% | - | |
10 | DE LEON Carlito | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
11 | FARRER Cheryl | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | - | |
12 | HUFF Ava | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
13 | BUONICONTI Liam | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 10% | |
14 | JACKOWSKI Jack | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
15 | WERNER Andrew | < 1% | 9% | 40% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
16 | JOLLIFF Nathan | 3% | 31% | 46% | 19% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.