Riverside Hilton - New Orleans, LA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | DECKER Hunter | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 2 | TRACY James | 1% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 3 | OLSON Clayton M. | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 42% | 5% |
| 3 | SATHYAN Dev | 8% | 34% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 5 | GASTON Ryan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 6 | GEIGER Devin T. | 1% | 11% | 39% | 39% | 10% | |
| 7 | WOJCIK Janusz | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 7 | BLANCHET Nolhan | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 9 | HERRERA Eduardo | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 10 | PATEL Avi S. | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 11 | WAID Ian | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | PARISI Nolan W. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | POHL Philip | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 14 | DAVIS Richard M. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 15 | VILLAREAL Quentin | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 16 | KRAEMER Craig | - | - | < 1% | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 17 | COHEN Jesse | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
| 18 | TUMULA Arihaan | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | COCHRAN Michael | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% |
| 20 | WEILER Jonathan | - | 7% | 31% | 45% | 16% | - |
| 21 | WEILER Barrett | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | RUSS Zachary | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SCHWARY Irv | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 24 | FEE Aiden | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | CRISTINA Jack | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | WILLIAMS-MORANTINE Killian | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 27 | SMALL slater | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | BALACHANDRAN Manu | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 9% | - |
| 29 | DESHOTEL Kenneth | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.