Duluth, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TREBON Hayden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | LIN Kason Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | HWANG Brandon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | CHA Patrick Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 5 | LEE Christopher Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | WANG Jiayu Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | HWANG Aidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | RAGHU Pranav Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | ROCKWELL Nolan | V | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
| 10 | YANG Alan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | IYER Arjun Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | OLDHAM Aidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | JEONG Eugene Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | YANAMANDRA Sidhansh Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | LANE Vincent Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | REDDY Daksh Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | ZHOU Alex | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | MAYO Candler | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
| 19 | SHOUSHA Hamza Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | JEONG Arisu Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | ADCOCK Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | TAYLOR Benjamin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | NAGANO Jonathan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | POLLACK Hudson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | JOHNSTON Grayson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | PONDER III Alfred Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | DANG Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | MA William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | CHEN Jordan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | KALAVA Nila Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | LEE Sean Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | YAN Kevin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | ARNOLD Calvin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | THIGPEN Logan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | LE Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | BEFEKADU Frazer Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | SIGG Noah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | HOLLINHEAD Caleb Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | RAGLAND Benjamin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | PINSONEAULT Cooper Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | SANCHEZ Sebastian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | EDGECOMBE Miller Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | MCLAREN Gavin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | MENON Rahul Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | MARTIN Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | LOEGEL Carter Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 48 | JAIN Aadi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | OCCHIALINI Bennett Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | RIDDLE Renzo Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 51 | WEINSCHENKER Dylan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 51 | HAZAR Adrian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 53 | SCHILKE Edward Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 54 | WILLIAMS Stevie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 55 | ADEGBENRO Isaiah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 56 | BURKE Aiden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 57 | YI Joshua Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | BALY Amr Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | STORY Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 60 | STAPLETON Yan Li Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 61 | KINZLER Nathan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 62 | BOWERS Morgan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 63 | KIM Ian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 64 | FOUNTAIN Elliott Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 65 | BREED Freddie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 66 | VINCENTINI SILVA Augusto Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 67 | BIOLSI Carter Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 68 | WILLIAMS Sabien Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 69 | COFER Gabe Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 70 | KLEPAL Paxton Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 71 | SEO Luke Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 72 | RIDGEWAY Joseph Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 73 | MOSLEY Khyri Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 74 | ARUNACHALAM Aadhavan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 75 | RODGERS Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 76 | BOOKER Julian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.