Brentwood High School - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | |
| 2 | WONG Baron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 25% |
| 3 | PAINTER Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 4 | LEE Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% | |
| 5 | DENISON Declan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | |
| 6 | NAZARIAN Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | |
| 7 | CHARETTE Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 6% | |
| 8 | KIM Tristan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 9 | WARD Edward | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | |
| 10 | PAEK Marcus | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | - | |
| 11 | CHARETTE Alex | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 12 | JU Hanul | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 13 | NOURAFCHAN Jonah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | 5% | |
| 14 | STAFFORD Bryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
| 14 | SCHERZAY Ian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | YOUNG Luke | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
| 18 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
| 19 | BYRNE Quinlan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | JONES Rodney | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | CAMP Ryder | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 22 | LARI Matthew | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | CHEONG Cameron | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 24 | IYER Pranav | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 25 | WELLS William | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | TAKU Mike | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 27 | PALMARES Xavier | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 28 | BECK Eli | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | 9% | |
| 29 | WOO Lucas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | KE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 6% | |
| 31 | ISAACS Atticus | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | ORMOND Andrew | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | BANGAYAN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
| 34 | HUNTINGTON Charles | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | RIVERA Fernando | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | YANAI Charlie | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | RAWLINSON Cameron | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | ZAPATA Matthew | 100% | 95% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | CALDWELL Sean | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | SAUTER Luke | 100% | 91% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | ARNALL Laszlo | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 42 | DAI MIKENEVER | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 43 | GUILLERMO Dante | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 44 | DAI Markenever | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CLARKE Luca | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | DONOHUE Angus | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | BAKER Livingston Xander | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 48 | DILORENZO Peter | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 48 | GRAHAM Jacob | 100% | 87% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | LEE Mason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | |
| 51 | PALAPA Yair | 100% | 89% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | SHAPIRO Benjamin | 100% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | GARCIA Miguel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 54 | KAMRAS Ryan | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | BENITEZ Kevin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 5% | |
| 56 | CHEN Alexander | 100% | 85% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | PROCTER Griffin | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 58 | DIAZ Jairo | 100% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 59 | CRYSTAL Cole | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 60 | AL-MIDANI Nuri | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 61 | GANDHI Jedd | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.