Woodling Gymnasium - Cleveland State University - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% | |
2 | LEO Jenna | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
3 | HU Sophie | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
3 | KOU Elisha | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 64% |
5 | BOIKE Lucille | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% | ||
6 | ZHANG Caroline | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
7 | FRASER Morgan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
8 | RIVERA Leahy | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
9 | HUANG Natalie | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
10 | KUANG Bella | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
11 | SALMI-BYDALEK Ada | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 42% | 14% | |
12 | KASHUBA Mila | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | |
13 | ZHANG Selina | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 11% | |
14 | YANG Hanli | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
15 | SHI Micah | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
16 | XU Charlene | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 1% | |
17 | HUANG Gabrielle | 5% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 3% | ||
18 | LEE Eun-Hae | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
19 | WANG Christina | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
20 | HUANG Emma | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 3% |
21 | EDGAR Koko | 26% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - | ||
22 | GONG Maggie | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | KIM Yuna | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 1% | |
24 | LIU Sophia | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
25 | SUN Nicole | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
26 | CULLIVAN Elise | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
27 | OWENS Genevieve | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
28 | ZHOU Jolena | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - | |
29 | BELL Blake | 9% | 39% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
30 | LIN Athena | 13% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
31 | FANG Savannah | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | DHALIWAL Seerat | 11% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | ||
33 | SHUI Zola | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
34 | REDEMANN Reagan | 8% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 2% | ||
35 | HUANG Rosalyn | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | - | - | |
36 | ZHAO Victoria | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - | |
37 | MILLER Sydney | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
38 | KAGAN Natalie | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
39 | LALONDE Beatrice | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | |
40 | YATES Annabelle | 23% | 46% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
41 | CHAVEZ Beatrix | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
42 | EVOLA Ellie | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.