Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHAW Ian | V V V V V | V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | RACHEL Dylan | V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | WANG Maxwell | V V V V V | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 | |
| 4 | WANG Bryan | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 | |
| 5 | NGUYEN Audrey | V V V V V | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 | |
| 6 | LABROZZI Aidan | V V V V D V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 | |
| 7 | KIM Daniel | V V V D V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 | |
| 8 | DO Joshua | V V V D V | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 | |
| 9 | LOUIS David | D V V V V V | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 | |
| 10 | TUCKER Evan | V D V V V | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 | |
| 11 | CHRISTIE Nathan | V V D V V | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 | |
| 12 | BROADHEAD Cole | D V V V V | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 | |
| 13 | YANG Maximus | D V V D V | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 | |
| 14 | MEREDITH Jeffrey | V V D D V | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 | |
| 15 | PIERCE Chandon | V D V D V | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 | |
| 16 | MO Benjamin | V D V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 | |
| 17 | KRIEGER Jack | D V D V V | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 | |
| 19 | ELEY Ellis | V D V D D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | |
| 20 | KINSELLA John | D D V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 | |
| 21 | BAKER Tyler | V V D V D D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 | |
| 22 | SHAKULA Matvey | D V D V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 | |
| 24 | GUTIERREZ Jacob | D V V D D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 | |
| 25 | IMRABTENE Gabriel | D V D D V | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 | |
| 26 | LEE Daniel | V V D D D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 | |
| 27 | SHADOFF Samantha | V D D D D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
| 28 | GOEBEL Alexander | D V D V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | |
| 29 | KEELE NICHOLAS | D D V D V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 | |
| 30 | CHEN Amity | V D D D D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 | |
| 31 | MESNER Talyn | D D D D V | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
| 32 | HUANG Arthur | D D V D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 33 | STEWART Sarah | D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 36 | LIN Jacob | V D D D D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 | |
| 37 | HUGHES Kayla | D D D D V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 38 | DAVIS Ansley | D D D D D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 | |
| 39 | YOUNG III Cecil | D D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
| 40 | MCCORD Jacob | D D D D D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 | |
| 41 | CARARO Daniel | D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.