Boise Fencing Club - Boise, ID, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JAN Timothy | - | - | - | - | 4% | 57% | 39% |
2 | GARDNER William | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 11% |
3 | GAN Shelby | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
3 | DIDENKO Nikita | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
5 | LITTLE Alex | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
6 | FREEMAN Evans | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
7 | BARTON Luke J. | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
8 | DOERR Zoe | - | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
9 | PULLARA Ashley | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
10 | MACK Jason A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
11 | BARTON Matthew P. | - | 7% | 30% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - |
12 | PUSHKIN HUANG Yam | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
13 | DAVIDSON James | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
14 | FRANS Erin | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
15 | DOERR Alea | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
16 | DOERR Jeff | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
17 | RALSTON Katherine | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 2% | - |
18 | GO-LINK Davin | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
19 | RAY Jessica | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
20 | BIRT Dagny | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% | - |
21 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 33% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
22 | WRIGHT Jacob | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% | - |
23 | HILL Aurora | 5% | 32% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
23 | HAGEDORN Sidney | 7% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
25 | HERNANDEZ Oliver | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
26 | ROBERTS Ryker | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
27 | BARTON Ryan | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
28 | MIRAVETE WHITMAN Ashleigh | 43% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.