Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JI Cody Walter | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
2 | MORRILL William | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
3 | FENG Leo | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
3 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
5 | WILSON Jude | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
6 | JIANG Anthony | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 13% | |
7 | CHON Taylor A. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
8 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
9 | ZHANG Jeffrey | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
10 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
11 | YUN Jaesun | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
12 | YUN Jake | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
13 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
14 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% |
15 | KIM Shaun M. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
16 | LI Minghan | - | 8% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
17 | ERMAKOV Lev | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 17% |
18 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
19 | LEE Justin | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
20 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | - | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
21 | HONG Steven | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
22 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
23 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
24 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
25 | TASIKAS Stylianos | - | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 40% | 37% |
26 | HUANG Connor | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
27 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
27 | SAGARDI David | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
29 | TURCK Caspar J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
30 | LIU Christopher X. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
31 | LUO George F. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% | |
32 | DUCKETT Myles | - | < 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
33 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 36% | 7% |
34 | STONE Esmond A. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
35 | WANG Charles | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% |
36 | XU Andrew | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
36 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
38 | YAO JINTAO | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
39 | BERRIO Carter E. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
40 | LIN Steve | 8% | 39% | 37% | 14% | 3% | < 1% | - |
41 | GRATHWOL-SEAR Oliver | 24% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | < 1% | - |
42 | WOODWARD Connor | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% | |
43 | YAO JINCHENG | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
44 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
45 | CHEN Lohen | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
46 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
47 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 1% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
48 | GAO Albert | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
49 | LEE Christopher M. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
50 | TRAVERS Arnav A. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
51 | KILGALLEN William | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
52 | DENG Andrew | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
53 | ZHANG William | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
54 | LEONARD Charles | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
55 | WU Richard | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
57 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | ZENG Noah | 1% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
59 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% |
60 | MALONE Gregory D. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
61 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
62 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% | |
63 | THORNHILL Kwasi | - | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
64 | CHAN Aidan | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
65 | QIU Nathan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
66 | CHEEMA Hyder | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
67 | PENG Bryan | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
68 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | SMINK Oliver | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
69 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
71 | CANNON Logan T. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
72 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
73 | HOLZ Daniel | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
74 | CHEONG Heonjun | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
75 | AVAKIAN Alec | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
76 | LEE Derek J. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
77 | ANDRES Michael | 2% | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | |
78 | LEE Aydan J. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
80 | BERA Enzo | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
81 | HU Christopher | - | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
82 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 5% |
83 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
83 | SERVES Alexander | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
85 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
86 | MEHTA Krish | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
87 | MAY Griffin M. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
88 | ZHANG Derek | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
89 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
90 | HOLZ William A. | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
91 | SUBRAMANIAM Oliver C. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
92 | LEWALLEN Reece | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
93 | HUANG Alex F. | - | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
94 | KOGAN Nikita | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
95 | YU Thomas | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
96 | BONETTI Brayden | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
97 | WANG Nicolas | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
97 | SAVOY Luca | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
99 | MCGUIRE Christian | 1% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
100 | WANG Robert | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
101 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
102 | KALPATHY Rohit | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
103 | OH Triton | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
104 | SHTEIN Yan | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
105 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
106 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | 6% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
107 | GONG ziqian | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
108 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
109 | TRAN Tripp L. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
110 | LARRAZOLO Vincent | 8% | 35% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
111 | SKIMEL Michael | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
112 | GAUVEY Kieran | 4% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
113 | LIU Lawrence | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
114 | PI Alexander | 13% | 36% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
115 | KESSLER Nathan | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
116 | CHOW William T. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
116 | TRAN Dash | 16% | 34% | 31% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
118 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
118 | BULLARD Nicholas Y. | 20% | 47% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
120 | AKS Ari | 2% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
121 | HU-VAN REETH Alexander | 36% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
122 | GONG zihao | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
123 | STROHL Samuel | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
124 | GOLDIN Lucca | 75% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
125 | PARKER Benjamin D. | 22% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
126 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
127 | LIN Philip T. | 7% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
128 | HENDERSON Jack | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
129 | PENG Victor | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
130 | OSENAR Sam | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
131 | GUREVICH Savely | 41% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
133 | CLARK Gabriel | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
134 | PARADIS Emmit | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
135 | NGUYENBA Thaison | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.