Dallas Market Hall **MAIN** - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 2 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | |
| 3 | CORTRIGHT Edmund | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 3 | TUMULA Arihaan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | ||
| 5 | OLSON Joseph | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 19% | ||
| 6 | GARIKIPATI Tharan | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 7 | KNYSH IURII | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 1% |
| 8 | KIM Leejay | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 4% | - | |
| 9 | LI Nathan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 10 | KHAVKIN Alexander | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 11 | YUE Bryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | - |
| 12 | MODI Rohan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 13 | VEERAVALLI Pranav | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 14 | PARKS-GOOD Tyler | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | ||
| 15 | STUDENY Mishko | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 16 | ZHAN ETHAN | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 2% | ||
| 17 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
| 18 | JIMENEZ PARRA Dorian D | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | LIU Austin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | LIN Edison | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | WU James | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | HUANG EVAN | 100% | 67% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 23 | DE LOS REYES Noah | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | ||
| 24 | CLARK Max | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 25 | KNAUER Tristan | 100% | 98% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.