Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 2 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 3 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 5 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 13% |
| 6 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 27% |
| 7 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 8% |
| 8 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 9 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | |
| 10 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 11 | MAREK SOFIA | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | |
| 12 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 13 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 14 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 15 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 16 | KONG Carys H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 17 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 11% | |
| 18 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 19 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 20 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% | |
| 21 | NATHANSON Samantha E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
| 22 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 25 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | HERRERA Fernanda | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 27 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
| 28 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 29 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 30 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 31 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 97% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 33 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 34 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
| 35 | PASHIN Anna | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | YANG Angelina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 37 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 2% | |
| 38 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 39 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 40 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 41 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 42 | BURCH Keona Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% | |
| 43 | MURRAY Audrey A. | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 45 | KER Grace | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 12% | |
| 46 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 47 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | YUN Emma | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 50 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | HUANG Caroline | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | WU Helen | 100% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 54 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 55 | YAM Danika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 56 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 91% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 100% | 73% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 58 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 59 | DONG Angel | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | TREACY Aisling | 100% | 86% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | ZHOU AnJi Angela | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 63 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 65 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 66 | LIN Sophia | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | MORROW Elsha | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 68 | WILMORE Claire | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | DONDERIS Katherine | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | BINNING Skylar | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | DRAPER Audrey | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | BULLARD Neha | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.