Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PATIL Amulya | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
2 | PULLEN Ayah | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
3 | KROPP Anne | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
3 | GAVASHELI Margarita | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% | |
5 | COMBS Hannah | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
6 | DASILVA Mia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 39% | 8% |
7 | LOZIER Grace | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
8 | HILBY Olivia | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
9 | LEVKOV Maita | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
10 | AZAD Ava | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
11 | COLLINS Molly | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
12 | MOYNIHAN Jones | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 49% | 8% |
13 | SUNMAN Rory | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
14 | NALABALLI Vashnie | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
15 | D'ANGELO Olivia | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
16 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
17 | IBRAHIM Layla | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 18% | 1% |
18 | DESAI Mallika | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
18 | EL BADAOUI Salma | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
20 | SHIN Jamie | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
21 | BUNCH Halle | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
22 | HOUSMANS Emma | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
23 | MEHDI Inaaya | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
24 | GILDEHAUS Mathilda | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
25 | NOLAN Sophia | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
26 | BROSNAN Mabel | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
27 | GULER Zeynep | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.