Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 2 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 3 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 3 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 5 | MATOS Lívia | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
| 6 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 38% | 30% | 5% |
| 7 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 8 | LI Sophia M. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 9 | ZHENG Julie | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
| 10 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 11 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% | |
| 12 | LEE Lavender | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 16% | 1% | |
| 13 | SHMAY Anastasia | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 14 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 15 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 16 | GOOR Viviene E. | 12% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | LIN Zhi tong | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 18 | HU Felice | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 47% | 10% | |
| 19 | WANG Jasmine | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 20 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 21 | HERGAN Anastasia K. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 22 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 46% | 8% | |
| 23 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 24 | ZHUANG Christina | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 25 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | MI Aileen | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | SHA Yi Ling | 4% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | SHIM Grace | 39% | 45% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | POPOKH Aleksandra | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | |
| 30 | NAIR Supriya | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
| 31 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 25% | 2% | |
| 32 | HUESER Nisha | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | |
| 34 | SYKES Elynor | 8% | 37% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | BURBERRY Livia | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 36 | CHOW Tessa | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | PRIZANT Rachel | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | ZHENG Zoe | 4% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 40 | WANG Jolie Z. | 15% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 4% | 34% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | YANG Iris | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 43 | STRUGAR Steliana | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CHOW Annabelle | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | LUH Mia P. | 5% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 47 | KHAN Leena | 2% | 35% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | ZGOMBIC Natalie | 63% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | ZHANG Alina | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.