Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
| 2 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | |
| 3 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 3 | XIAO Ruien | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | |
| 5 | LEACH Meka A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 6 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 7 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 8 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 1% |
| 9 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 10 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
| 11 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 12 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 13 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 14 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 15 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 16 | HSU Adele Y. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 17 | REMEZA Alissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 18 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 19 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 20 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 21 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 24 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 26 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 27 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 27 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 4% |
| 29 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 30 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% |
| 31 | BOHRER Shira | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 32 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 26% | |
| 33 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 11% |
| 34 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 2% | |
| 36 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | |
| 37 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 38 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 39 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 40 | KAUSHISH Sara | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 43 | GORNOVSKY Abigail | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 1% |
| 45 | DENG Annie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 46 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 48 | LI Suri | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 2% | |
| 49 | QU ZHUOYING | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 50 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | LEE Rachel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 52 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 52 | DONG Ava | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 54 | AI Amy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 13% |
| 55 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 56 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 57 | LI Bingqi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 58 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
| 59 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 60 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 11% | - | |
| 61 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 62 | CHAWLA Aanya | 100% | 91% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | MENDOZA zoie | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 65 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 66 | ODOM Megan A. | 100% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | GREGORY Aleksandra | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 68 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 70 | MACEY Hadley | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 71 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 92% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 73 | STERR Isabella M. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 74 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 7% | |
| 75 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 76 | LAM Amelia Paige | 100% | 99% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 77 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 78 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 66% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 79 | QIU Emily | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 80 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 81 | SUN Hanya | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 82 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 83 | BARCLAY Khyri | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 84 | MIRZA Annoshae | 100% | 91% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 85 | PAN Iris | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 88 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 89 | XIA Amy | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 90 | HU Yutong | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 91 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 92 | UMANSKIY Ilana E. | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 93 | TASIKAS Irena | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 94 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 95 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 96 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 97 | SHORI Samantha | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 98 | SON Erica | 100% | 71% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 99 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 101 | SOIN Kaira | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 102 | ANDERSON Melody | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | JARONIK Izzie | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 104 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 105 | YUMIACO Nylah | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 106 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.